Find a Lawyer

MANNU KHAN AND 3 OTHERS versus THE STATE

Section 302/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), the Section 342 Death Declaration which was serious evidence against the accused, was allegedly made and believed by the victim before the police officer / prosecutor's witness. Has tried to convict the accused even though his attention is on the side. This important evidence was not discovered, nor was it sought for any explanation at the time of its examination under section 342, CRPC, so that the trial court would consider the accused. To be drawn to the declaration, they were prejudiced, resulting in an abortion. It was a matter of justice and such naked conduct that the accused should be given notice of the point / point from which he should receive the apology, which was not merely formal but an essential part of the trial in which The alleged death was announced. The evidence of the witness and the affected mind of the court were its contents S 342, the CCPC's mandatory provisions were not complied with by the trial court; the conviction and sentence were held on grounds of incompetence and the case section 342. The remand for the trial was obtained from the trial phase of the accused under CRPC. lawer from fb area from Khushab lawyer