Section 2 302/3434 An accused sprinkled kerosene on the deceased and set it on fire, reporting the first information to a genuine document, the ocular account of the natural witness with no delay and no prior investigation. There was an incident that took place and the name of which was mentioned in the first information report, not to be suspected of the fact that the incident occurred in the light of day and the accused, who was formerly known as eyewitnesses, easily The witnesses were identified, which led to a lengthy examination of the witnesses, but they remained inconsistent and made a statement in court. There is no indication that the witnesses' statement against the accused was tutored or that they had encountered any contradictions or any legal weakness or witnesses. The integrity of was inaccessible
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
