SAID AHMAD versus FAIZ MUHAMMAD
The Ease of Life Act 1882 Section 13 (0 quasi ease) For ease of data, it had to be determined that ease was not only apparent and permanent but also necessary to enjoy share share because when it was enjoyed. It was held that when the property was divided, the plaintiff did not prove his position by showing the relevant position that he wanted the plot to go through the plot in the dispute but the plaintiff's land was well concerned with the west bank but after the consolidation. It has no concern and has been restrained from falling on the other side of the well, the plaintiff cannot say. To establish any right of ease, whether by necessity or to some extent, is relaxed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Jhatta Bhutta lawyer
