ALLAH BAKHSH versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB
Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 42 West Pakistan Dedicated Properties Ordinance (XXVIII of 1961), Section 2 (d) West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 42 West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules, 1968, Rr 34 and 36 Evidence Act ( I, 1872), Sections 40, 41, 42 and 43 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Sections 144 and 145 (6), for the declaration of status reports made in the journal Waquetti and the Magisterial Order. , The CRPC proved that the relevant court control was relevant to the applicant at the time and supported his position that he was excluded from the property devoted to the dispute by the Department of Defense. It was then restored, including a cash chest kept in the court to receive detention. Due to copies of the public records, the petitioner's case was brought under review in his port that the applicant was standing in the dispute that he was the subject of the court's dispute in the dispute when the applicant and the defendant filed the petition. The fact that a notice of fact was withdrawn under the notification that the applicant was reinstated to de facto control, especially on the cash chest, was enough point to substantiate the claim, which led to the controversial dedication to all AI. Can be declared.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Khangah Sharif lawyer