Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MST. GULZAR BIBI versus MAHRAM


Section 5 and 14 (2) (b) of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964, Article 199 (Article 199) challenged the petition of the appellant on appeal on the grounds that the order of reinstatement was filed. Has been disregarded under section 14 (2) (b) the parties to the Family Courts Act, 1964, have reached an agreement with the Appellate Court on the issue of restitution, against which to increase the amount of restitution by the applicant. The appeal was made. The applicant was a party to the settlement which complied with the appellate court order. The pending litigation between the parties was brought to rest, as a result the applicant received certain privileges under which the applicant could not be allowed to re-approve and reproduce similar transactions. Is.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Hyderabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.