MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus SAFDAR HUSSAIN MALIK
West Pakistan Citizens Rent Ordinance 1959 Section 13 Act (X of 1873), Section 8 to 12 Withdrawal Request The decision on the request for oath on oath was entered into the court between the parties and their statements, under which The landlord (defendant) had to take the oath. The landlord took a specific date regarding the Holy Qur'an, but his statement on that date could not be terminated because the request of the tenant (applicant) who rejected his oath offer was rejected and the landlord's statement The closing order was approved by the Rent Controller. Finding the oath based on the landlord's justification for the landlord, where both parties agreed to resolve the dispute by taking the oath of the Qur'an and such a statement was recorded by the rent controller. , There was an agreement between the parties and there was no agreement. The parties may be allowed to withdraw from such an agreement, despite the fact that they had voluntarily entered into a court agreement, in lieu of their disqualification in court seeking a rented controller, the landlord's food It could not be completed that day that the tenant could not resign from the contract was not open to challenge the law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Chowk Maitla lawyer