Find a Lawyer

HANIF versus THE STATE

In the presence of both Sections 302, 307 and 148/149, it is admitted that the attendance of two killed, injured witnesses and three injured accused complained of an attack on the night before. In order to save his life, various sides were accused of chasing him at great distances and letting two deadly blows and the third blood was found in two remote places, not in front of the accused's house, but the party that compensated the story of the prosecution. Allegedly with 3 dings and one armed robbery still no more damage to the accused party. No person was found to have suffered any serious injury. One of the accused snatched the knife from the witness, two of the victims suffered fatal injury and The third competent accused did not file a private complaint or provide any defense evidence that led to the request for defense. Their shared intent to kill the accused remotely was perfectly clear in the circumstances. immigration advocates contact from Mandi Faizabad lawyer