Find a Lawyer

FAQIR MUHAMMAD versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, TOGA TEK SINGH

Amendment of Question of Fraud in CPC CC Code XL, Article 199 of the Constitution of the CPC Appeals Regarding the Constitution of Pakistan (VII R 17) Although requested by the plaintiff in its plaintiff but not yet Until now no details about the fraud were provided. The trial court rejected, but the review court allowed the defendant to introduce the details of the fraud in his case to the fact that the plaintiff had already been allowed to give details of the fraud described in his jurisdiction, Even then, this would not change at all. The nature of the trial court was empowered to allow appropriate amendments to the parties' requests to determine the real question in the dispute, as long as the fraud. If you do not provide the necessary details regarding the fraud, the fraud question cannot be determined in which case The review court had passed the order. Legal and justice cannot be prosecuted for such fraudulent details and such order cannot be enjoined in the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court as no writ can be issued in relief of injustice. law websites from Bhera lawyer