Find a Lawyer

AHMAD DIN versus MUHAMMAD DIN

West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance 1959 Section 15 (5 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), OVII, R7 and Sections 115 and 11) excludes property designated property by claiming that the disputed portion of the property. They were permanently transferred to the foreclosure interest and to the defendant's claim that some part of the property was transferred to him and the plaintiff in the interest of the applicants is a tenant under it is a gross misrepresentation of the respondents. And the order passed by the High Court was upheld till the petitioner of the Supreme Court and then it will decide to sign this declaration. That the order of exclusion by the Rent Controller and all subsequent orders has been granted on the basis of unlawful misrepresentation and fraud, which has been rejected by the trial court. The rental proceedings acted as justice on the basis of the High Court's decision and his appeal was also dismissed by the First Appeal Court on the request that the case be barred by section 15 (5). Was granted, the West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959 was issued, neither matters were settled nor evidence was recorded nor legally there for the following courts to conclude. That the suits were affected by the rule of the judiciary, the ruling in the High Court's jurisdiction will not be carried out because the court of justice is legal The trial court has been remanded for a felony verdict. best law firm from Kotri lawyer