Find a Lawyer

H.M. SADDIQ & CO. versus VOLKART (PAKISTAN) LTD., KARACHI

According to the plaintiff's agreement in contravention of the Contract Act 1872 Section 73 Cotton, the supply of Rs. The cost of cotton is decided in February 1973 for the purchase of 1000 bales of cotton and the plaintiff suffers the loss for failing to supply the required amount of procurement, trial. In determining the amount of damages on the defendant's testimony on cotton prices, determine the suit and declare a suit for the same. As for the sale price of NE 2, 1973, Rs 140 per minute undisclosed price was not committed by the trial court for any kind of illegality which was not in favor of the equity. The defendant's appellant who opted not to supply cotton for the defendant, in view of the increase in the price, must keep it, again, to compensate the defendant for the compensation amount which Appeals dismissed famous high court advocate from Dina lawyer