BASHIR AHMAD versus FATEH SHAH
Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Sections 4 and 15 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 100 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 3 pre-discrimination litigation question fact suit was contested only on the grounds of limitation. The vendors claimed that the suit was banned from time to time as long as they were occupying the suit land, after the courts reached a conclusion that the property was, If not at all, it's already been a long time and it may not be related to its own sales. The entries in the revenue records which indicate that the occupation of the shopkeepers were based on a long-standing record and, therefore, it was not a new event for them to enter the underground so that potential advance. The appellant's process was not set up before the courts below the information to be submitted and the fact is, the second appeal cannot be disturbed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Loralai lawyer