Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), the appeal of the tenant appeals court against the section 15 withholding order, did not discuss the evidence at its own discretion but dispersed the same decision. He reached the trial court. Even if the constitutional petition was authorized where the appellate court failed to discuss the evidence in its finding, the finding of the court could thus be held liable by the appellate court, where the appellate court did not discuss the evidence. Without legal authority and cannot be considered as a reasonable settlement of the appeal, the constitutional petition cannot be processed, after the case has been discussed as evidence by the appellate court as the appellate court, to be re-called for judgment. Was made, according to the requirements of a decision. However, it made it clear that he did not take any exception to the consequences of such an appeal, as well as the final jurisdiction with which the court had exclusive jurisdiction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
