Sections 191919, 202020, 888, 1 Acc1, 2 472 and 808080 were charged with providing fraudulent checks on a complaint by fraud and receiving goods in return, but the supply of checks proved beyond reasonable doubt. Could not be and is against the suspects, who were not taken from them. The location and explanation is why the investigating officer provided the complainant's own irresponsible and ridiculous behavior and his statement contained the story of the prosecution regarding the investigation of the investigation report against the accused. The fact that the facts were dishonored on the record in the investigation has made it clear that the accused was previously known. The complainant had to do business, the market. But the complainant stated that he did not know about it before, though he had accepted the postal check from the accused, there was no definite explanation for issuing and accepting the postdate check given by the prosecutor, The weaknesses and contradictions present in the prosecution's evidence and charge are against the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
