THE STAT versus MUHAMMAD ZAKIR KHAN CHANGEZI
Section 307 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), the Section 417 Trial Court, ordering acquittal of the accused on the basis that there was ambiguity and doubt in the prosecution's case. The investigation conducted by the Investigating Officer was not honest and was subject to irregularities. In fact, the court required entry into the journal which was not submitted by the concerned police officer despite the orders to appear in court. The ballistic expert was given an indirect opinion on five wrong cartridges that did not have sufficient identifying data; If a witness does not agree to the court proceedings, he may be present. Non-bailable and unsecured warrants were obtained through the arrest process
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Quaidabad lawyer