UNITED BANK LTD. versus MAHMOOD SHAH
Appeal for restoration of appeal dismissed by the appellant, stating that his lawyer did not receive notice of the appeal. Wind. Appeal hearing when it was outside the station's statement that the appellant's lawyer did not receive notice of the hearing of the appeal pending from the court and did not know the due date for hearing the appeal, which was accepted by the court. It was held that due to its misunderstanding, the lawyer should not burden the appellant with information about the date of the appeal hearing. Being clearly involved in misunderstanding, O XLI, R 17 may not be attracted to the provisions of the CPC, but instead S151 will be attracted in respect of the CPC. The transfer of a dynamic application for a restitution appeal and such application may be filed after 30 days as Article 181 of the Limitation Act will apply in this case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Bunner lawyer