ALI ANWAR AND 2 OTHERS versus THE STATE
Corruption Prevention Act 1947 Section 409 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2), to the employee of public utility stores on misconduct and to purchase auxiliary vouchers selling ordinary goods in his name. A check of Rs 22,500 was issued. 10,000 rupees, which was also entered in cash and the rest of the money was not brought on the record. Was taken out? Only five thousand said that the accused had received the purchase of merchandise which he confessed and offered to pay the same amount received by a co-accused as he had the accused Rs 400. Was unable to return the money except the amount that could only be deducted from his salary.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer
