Find a Lawyer

AFTAB AHMAD KHAN versus WAZIR AHMAD

The petition filed by the applicant / respondent on several occasions was dismissed by the defendant on several occasions after the proceedings in the case under section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, were filed in order to counter the case. Seized the opportunity to file a written statement under Section 34, the Arbitration Act, 1940, to avoid filing a written statement for which the trial court had granted the Applicant Act the last and final opportunity. ? The petitioner / defendant's part in filing the petition under section 34 of the Arbitration Act 1940 was not only a violation of the requirements of the aforesaid law but was also contradictory to the refusal to file a written statement. Right to dismiss was decided by applicant review request dismissed

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• DILDAR HUSSAIN alias DIBAR v. JUDGE FAMILY COURT, SUB-DIVISIONAL COURTS, TEHSIL CHICHAWATNI 2014 MLD 1388
• Mrs. REHANA KAUSAR v. PAKISTAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY LIMITED (PEPCO) 2014 PLC(CS) 1392
• ALI MUBIN v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 2014 MLD 1395
• BASHIRAN BIBI v. CITY POLICE OFFICER, FAISALABAD 2014 PCrLJ 1395
• KHALID AND BROTHER v. PUNJAB PROVINCE through Secretary Housing Urban Development and Public Health Engineering Department 2014 CLD 1410
• MUHAMMAD YAQOOB alias GOSHI v. State 2014 YLR 1412
• MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. State 2014 MLD 1413
• Sayed ABDUL FAHEED v. HASSAN MUHAMMAD 2014 CLC 1418

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

property advocates from Samundri lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes