Find a Lawyer

SYED ANIS AHMAD SHAH versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 561A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), submitted to court by a tenant in a rent-charged case of section 195, deposited an amount, self-imposed On the complaint filed by the Comptroller and his endorsement, the Section HO sent the session to the Sessions Court, which had alleged seriousness of the accused's contention and alleged that the Court of Session was given by the police. Could not take serious action on a report, but should have complained, filed by the Rent Controller during the judicial proceedings itself. The alleged fraud was committed, the simplicity of depositing money in a proceeding cannot be termed a judicial or judicial proceeding, but the administrative proceedings and the alleged fraud were not related to any proceedings. According to any court whose purpose in section 195 (1) (b), the CCP forgery was actually constituted in a non-judicial proceeding in which ten ants submitted rent which did not have the issues of the parties since Section H.O. Had sent a literal copy of the rent controller's complaint to the Sessions Court, and the copy was subsequently taken into consideration in the matter, so it was, in fact, a complaint made by the rent controller. Recovery of suspects arrested by police and application to terminate proceedings against illegal suspects online advocate from Sibi lawyer