MUHAMMAD ISHAQ versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Sections 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 406 and 420, termination of the employment of the two co-accused, the son of the accused by the trial court, Section 249A, CRPC Was acquitted and retained the case against the accused. The pending money was paid to the accused and not to his sons who were not parties to the alleged transaction The evidence available against the accused trial court was correct, as the charges against both of the accused's sons were kept separate. Went to
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Hala lawyer
