SALEEM SHAH versus THE STATE
Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Art 4 Proof, 130 grams of heroin appreciation recovered on personal search of the accused, only one of the three witnesses was investigated, all operations allegedly to retrieve and seal heroin. Are causing. By demonstrating the same action at the shop, it was shown that the shopkeeper did not present or refer only to the presence of a public witness, suspicious witnesses contradict each other's material points on the testimony given in the FIR and recovery memo. The names make specific allegations against the investigating officer of various and dubious suspicion, and to ask him specific questions, the recovery of heroin from the accused was not without a doubt and the defendant's plea that he be able to obtain probable acquittal I have been ordered.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Thana Bula Khan lawyer
