MESSRS PAK UNITED HOUSING ENTERPRISE versus RAMZAN
Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), section 113 suit for the specific performance of the sale contract, was executed by the plaintiffs in favor of the plaintiff and the full value of the sale received by the plaintiff Could not find any part. The sale process was executed and the defendants were not paid the balance price! Despite the notice and notice registered in the paper, the plaintiffs refused service through the registered notice, however, the notice published in the paper would be considered good service against the plaintiff of the plaintiff, therefore, on the date of publication of the notice It will be considered that the defendants will refuse to sign the contract if the plaintiff is bound to the flow suit within three years of the date of the agreement or where they have been informed that the defendant has refused the contract. Defendants' refusal to contract, failure to file a lawsuit within three years, their claim was banned
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
