KARAM ALI versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF
Section 141 and 172 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 and the Special Relief Act (of 1877), a section 42 declaration by a cashier once, which resulted in the claim for distribution related relief. Yes, there was a civil court's authority for such a trial. Not affected by the provisions of Sections 141 and 172 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, to ensure that the plaintiff is a partner and relief of joint possession is not prohibited, except for distribution assistance, the plaintiff has Had also claimed. The division occupied the land and requested that the defendants deny his title and refuse to give him a share of the production, and thus prayed for the approval of the declaration of his title, 1967. Such cases are not barred by the provisions of Sections 141 and 172 of Act XVII. In the civil suit, the jurisdiction of the civil court is not easily assessed unless the jurisdiction is explicitly or implicitly stripped of it, and this appellate court continues to search. The civil court in the review noted that the civil court had jurisdiction to hear such a case because it was unable to be retained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Lakimarwat lawyer