Deadly Accident Act 1855 Section 1 Appellant was killed in a fatal accident as a result of a hasty and negligent driving of an employee's vehicle, witnesses, including witnesses, proved that the victim's income was justified, evidence of witnesses Not investigating, the trial court recorded that the victim's death was negligence of the appellant's driver and that he was liable to pay compensation and estimated the monthly income of the victim as Rs. 1 000 000 monthly and to the respondents. (The father and mother of the loser) is awarded the compensation. Deposits) @ Rs Dece Rs per month for a period of sixteen years, depending on the factors of his age, was an illegal income hawker, the average monthly income expected by the High Court to be in W W since After marriage, money would be needed to help his wife and children if he had any, he could not contribute a large part of his income to the care of his parents in his trial court order. To the extent that the adjournment income was fixed at Rs 8W per month and the loss of the defendant (mother and father) was fixed at Rs 400 per month Prepared to pay accountants accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
