MUHAMMAD HABIBULLAH SIDDIQUE versus HAJI HABIB JAFFARALI
The appearance and non-appearance of the parties to CPC's Civil Procedure Code Order IX resulted in the negligence of the Appeal Prosecution against the O IX, Rr 8 & 9 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 plaintiff. The case was absent and even when the court directed the plaintiff's lawyer to appear in person, it was also shown that such plaintiff was negligent and was given by his lawyer. Despite the information, the court had failed to appear because his statement had to explain to the plaintiff about his absence and important date, but no affidavit was submitted by the lawyer that the plaintiff's In the absence of such an explanation that his lawyer was negligent, was caught, could not be forgiven. It is his duty to ensure that his case was properly prosecuted, the trial court rightly refuses to restore the case and does not require such an order. Was made of reference
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
