DR.ANSAR AHMED versus AYUB ZAIDI
In the payment of rent, Sindh Rented Prices Ordinance 1979 Sections 15 and 21 evict default landlord and tenant respondent denies the relationship of tenant landlord and tenant and claims that he owns the house He first served the appellant temporarily for ten days and then made a purchase. There is neither evidence of any documentary evidence provided by the respondents nor any of the witnesses examined in support of the appellant in his case for consideration after taking possession of the affidavit, along with two other witnesses on the other side. States that it was purchased by a third person under the contract. The appellant also submitted a photocopy of the sale agreement brought by the appellant to the German property owned by the Cell Court but the appeal against it is pending, with the appellant owning substantial evidence in favor of the landlord and the contract. In view of this, the respondent temporarily seized it, the landlord and the tenant were present between the parties. Eater finally decided on a civil dismissal application under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Jehanian lawyer