Find a Lawyer

DAWOOD CORPORATION LTD. versus MST. JASIAN JASIMINA

Article 73 of the Contract Act 1872 stipulates the agreement between the plaintiff and the defendants in the case of foreign exchange in case of a breach of contract provided that the money provided to the claimant on account of the services offered by it is the contract. Violations are paid where the plaintiff's exchange was to be in foreign exchange; at the time of breach of contract, the rate will be retained for the purpose of changing the Pakistani currency, ie when the plaintiff is sued for filing a lawsuit. Receive a pass and not when there was money. Payable to the plaintiff M. Pound Sterling, however, when he was sued, he preferred his claim in Pakistan currency \ though he was identified in the equivalent foreign currency but he was in this position. Failed to change because there was no prayer claim for payment. Pound sterling currency claims will only be valid for currency exchange when the contract was violated The defendant, who remains silent by the defendants, will not be entitled to increase his claim on the basis of this exchange rate fluctuation. The plaintiff shall be entitled to the amount claimed by him originally from the Industrial Development Bank of Pakistan by Messrs. William Sons & Company Limited and 2 others PLD 576; Mr. Khurshid Jamal v. Mohammad Asghar Qureshi LD 1957 Sindh 47; Dr. Mohammad Rafiq-ud-din and another v. Federation of Pakistan PLD 1960 Kar 506; Henry Stanley Ramadan And 2 other section P vs LED 1964 and 290 M surplus, Khanewal Oil Mills Ltd, KP Khanewal D 1962 (WP) lacquer 821, Central Bank of India Limited vs. famous high court advocate from Chaghi lawyer