Find a Lawyer

TELEPHONE EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD. versus AISH MUHAMMAD

Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Section 12 (2) and OXIII, R3 Cooperative Society Act (VIII of 1925), section 54 suits to declare that OXI, R3, CPC The orders under were obtained by fraud and misrepresentation. The provisions of Section 54 of Act VII of 1925 were to touch the business of the Society and there was a dispute between the members and the Society and the Registrar was nominated for arbitration. In order to allocate another plot to the respondent. Who filed an application for execution of the award before the civil judge who was dismissed, the respondent did not file an appeal before the El District Judge but another respondent who was the general secretary of the society agreed to the matter which Due to the appellate court petitioner, the invalid order was passed. The question before the court, which was obtained by the defendant in dealing with other defendants by practicing fraud and misrepresentation, was whether the court in any way received the orders for the settlement application on appeal. Was committed for fraud or misrepresentation, cannot be said to touch the proceedings and business of the society such as a dispute, nor can it be said to be an unrelated order which the court approved. What is said and done by the Registrar or his / her nominated candidate cannot be given such relief Department of Co-operative Societies Act 1925, has been banned by 54 and has been described as a separate court. And holy attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Sidhnoti lawyer