CHAIRMAN, KARACHI WATER AND SEWERAGE BOARD versus WAZIR HYDER
Rule Civil Code 1908 Section 24, O VII, R 11 and O XXXIX, RR 1 and 2 Transfer of the case to a pre-revision application against an order approved under the court's preliminary VI, VII, Rule 11, CPC That the first fax case was disclosed upon reading the case, and that the applicant's counsel cited the transfer request as a transfer of the case to the non-disputing case, whereas the application under R11, R11 In deciding, the Civil Procedure Code must be limited to the reading of the raid observations made. After the court read the case, the request for a review of the existence of the primary fax case was considered for the plaintiff's rejection. There was no justification for this view, because the court denied, and found a first case. To dismiss the case under O. VII, R 11, it is likely that the Court may have been influenced by their own observations in the appeal which is now born to apply under O XXXIX, Rr 1 and 2 provisionally While the case is in favor of the plaintiff in the decision to apply for a grant of immunity, the court considers not only the plaintiff's written statement from the parties but also other material placed before him, while the plaintiff's dismissal Dealing with Prayer Under A VII, R 11, the CPC court could not look at any material other than the plaintiff and the court with it. VII avoids the expression of any opinion on the cases cited by the applicant at the stage of the decision of the application under R 11. Similarly, the CPC was not relevant at this stage
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Thul lawyer