ANWAR MASIH versus THE STATE
The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3), the definition of ocular evidence, the prosecution's sole evidence was found to be invalid on material points and did not improve upon its statement filed by the magistrate immediately after its recovery. He recovered from the suspect. At the relevant time, the accused was arrested in a weapons case and formally arrested in the current case for conflicting with each other regarding the whereabouts of the retrieving witnesses in the execution of the prosecutor's warrant, Prosecutors were accustomed to having intercourse and were pregnant for three months and there is no proven evidence of detention. Recovery from the prosecution, the accused failed to establish a case on a verdict of acquittal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Shadiwal lawyer
