Articles 302, 324, 392, 411 and 34 of Kadal Kadam, no day's attempt, robbery, fraudulently receiving stolen property, joint intention, and no serious explanation in the FIR of such a serious delay are mentioned. , Which raised serious doubts about the truth of the prosecution's case about the deceased's death, and was investigated with a delay of about thirty-four hours. There was no plausible explanation for the delay, which led to serious suspicion of the fact of the story and the complainant's evidence was highly contradictory and the prosecution's testimony was based on a hearing in which the accused Identity was not paraded If there is no mention of the allegedly snatching currency notes from the alleged complainant, it is mentioned in the FIR or in the Complainant's statement before the trial court, not in the FIR, Neither a specific identification mark, no make-up, nor wrist watch was mentioned on the phone, or in the complainant's statement, the mobile phone, the wrist restoration, is alleged to be a watch and cash, which is alleged by both the accused. Was jointly implicated, not useful for prosecution The alleged rehabilitation of a motorcycle was not helpful in a prosecution case because the FIR contained Time of the incident that the accused has not been used for a motorcycle. No forensic science laboratory report on the carbine and pistol was in the record; in the absence of any matching report of any crime related to the carbine and 30 bore pistols, the alleged retrieval of the weapon was unnecessary, and that was the prosecution.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
