Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 36/B of 1987, decided on 24th January, 1987.
‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑All eye witnesses deposing to be not present at spot at relevant time in their statements under S. 164, Cr.P.C.‑‑Case held to be of further inquiry‑‑ Bail granted in circumstances.
Malik Nazar Farid Khokhar for Petitioner.
Ch. Muhammad Hussain Chadhhar for the Complainant.
The petitioner stands charged with the murder of Naimat Ali deceased with rifle shot on 18‑6‑1986. The occurrence was witnessed by Muhammad Shafi, Hakim Ali and Asghar Ali.
2. Bail is claimed on the ground that all the three eye‑witnesses have got their statements recorded under section 164, Cr.P.C. to the effect that they were not present at the spot at the relevant time. Learned counsel for the complainant confirms this position.
3. In this view of the matter, it is case of further inquiry. Accordingly I grant the petition and. admit the petitioner on bail in the sum of Rs.20,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C., Okara.
S.A./G‑24/L Bail allowed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer