Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

GHULAM FARID versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 497 (XLV of 1860), Sections 307, 326 and 452/34 bail, the accused confessing to the murder is empty-handed after the crime, the injured witness stated in his statement. Punished under the CCP and statement, the accused filed a bail in the circumstances because of misunderstanding

1987 P Cr. L J 945

[Lahore]

Before Khizar Hayat, J

GHULAM FARID and 2 others‑‑Petitioners

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No 955/B of 1986, decided on 20th November, 1986.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 307, 326 & 452/34‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Murderous assault‑‑Accused admittedly empty‑handed at time of occurrence‑‑Injured witness exonerating accused in his statement under S. 164, Cr.P. C. and stating, case registered due to misunderstanding‑‑Accused granted bail in circumstances.

Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi for Petitioner

Iftikhar Fakhar, for the State.

ORDER

Muhammad Hussain, father‑in‑law of Nazir Ahmad injured witness lodged report at Police Station Jalalpur Pirwala against Shamir and Fida Hussain petitioners besides Ghulam Farid and Mehr Ali on the allegations that they made murderous assault on aforesaid Nazir Ahmad when he was sleeping near his cattle‑pen on the night between 10/11th July, 1986. The occurrence was allegedly witnessed by Ghaus Bakhsh and Muhammad Amin besides the complainant. The petitioners were arrested on 22‑7‑1986. The petitioners applied for the grant of bail in the lower Court but remained unsuccessful, hence, this application.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well for the State and also perused the record.

3. Admittedly, the petitioners were empty‑handed at the time of occurrence, therefore, no injury has been attributed to them. The injured witness namely Nazir Ahmad has stated before the Magistrate in his statement recorded under section 164, Cr.P.C. that the case against the petitioners was got registered due to misunderstanding. He does not implicate the petitioners as his assailants. In the circumstances, this petition is allowed. He is directed to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.10,000 each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner/ Duty Magistrate, Multan.

S.A./G‑10/L Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Mardan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.