Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

BADAR MUNIR versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 497 (Code XLV of 1860), Sections 325 and 326/34 Guarantees, Grant of other persons allegedly injured, with Sota injury attributed to the accused, up to four months in prison. The alleged FIR revealed the disclosures under Section 325, PPC

1987 P Cr. L J 558

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, J

BADAR MUNIR--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3039-B of 1985, decided on 23rd December, 1985.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

--S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 325 & 326/34--Bail, grant of--Accused alongwith others allegedly causing injuries with Sota--Injury attributed to accused, declared grievous--Accused in jail for about four months--Allegations in F.I.R. disclosed offence falling under S.325, P.P.C. not covered by prohibitory clause of 5.497, Cr.P.C.--Bail granted in circumstances.

Hassan Ahmad Khan Kanwar for Petitioner.

M. Naseem Iqbal for the State.

ORDER

Badar Munir petitioner has moved this petition for bail in a case registered against him under section 325/34, P.P.C. During the investigation, section 326/34, P.P.C. was added substituted.

The F.I.R. version is that on 15-8-1985 the petitioner and his co-accused Muhammad Hayat and Muhammad Sher caused injuries to Nur Muhammad with 'Sotas.

The medical examination of Nur Muhammad revealed ten injuries, out of which injury No. 9 on the left leg attributed to the petitioner, was declared grievous.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner was arrested -on 24-8-1985. The allegations contained in the F.I.R. disclose an offence under section 325, P.P.C. which does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. I, therefore, admit the petitioner to bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, Okara.

S. A./771/L Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Bunner lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.