Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NAUKAR HUSSAIN versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 426 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 304, Part II of the conviction, after a sudden quarrel, was observed to occur without pre-trial and no weapon to be attacked. Was not used and does not repeat injury. The applicant allowed bail in the circumstances

1987 P Cr. L J 508

[Lahore]

Before Ijaz Nisar, J

NAUKAR HUSSAIN--Appellant

Versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1 of 1986 in Criminal Appeal No. 741 of 1986, decided on 11th January, 1987.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 426--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.304, Part II--Sentence, suspension of--Trial Court observing that occurrence took place without premeditation, upon a sudden quarrel and accused not using any weapon in assault nor repeating injuries--Petitioner allowed bail, in circumstances.

Rana Badar Munir for Appellant.

Muhammad Bashir Mirza for the State.

ORDER

This is a petition on behalf of Naukar Hussain for suspension of sentence. He has been convicted by the learned Sessions Judge, Gujranwala on 11-11-1986 under section 304, Part II, P.P.C. and sentenced to undergo 5 years' R.I. plus fine with benefit of section 382-B, Cr.P.C.

2. Suspension of sentence is urged on the ground that the learned trial Court in para. No. 22 of his judgment has observed that 'the occurrence had taken place without pre-meditation upon a sudden quarrel in the fight which erupted suddenly. If Naukar Hussain had any intention to kill Muhammad Anwar, he must have come to the spot duly armed but admittedly he did not use any weapon in the assault. He also did not repeat the injuries'.

3. In view of the circumstances of the case, I grant the petition and suspend the sentence of the petitioner and admit him to bail subject to his furnishing security in the sum of Rs.15,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of A . C . , Gujranwala.

S. G. D./750/L Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.