Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUNAWAR ALI versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 fornication but persons who have taken an oath and disclosed to witness such incidents and are allegedly forced to become police witnesses, The co-accused allowed bail in the circumstances

1987 P Cr. L J 410

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, J

MUNAWAR ALI--Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No.963 of 1983, decided on 14th May, 1983.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 497--Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss. 13 & 14--Bail, grant of--Co-accused allegedly let on hire to petitioner for purpose of illicit intercourse in presence of two persons but such persons having sworn affidavits and disclaiming to have witnessed such occurrence and allegedly forced by Police to become witnesses- -Co-accused allowed bail, in circumstances.

R . A . Awan for Petitioner.

Ashtar Ali for the State.

ORDER

Munawar Ali petitioner has moved this petition for bail in a case registered against him and others under sections 13 and 14 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979. Criminal Miscellaneous No. 290-B of 1982 previously filed by him was dismissed by me on 17th November, 1982.

2. The prosecution version was that on 15th September, 1982 co-accused Mst . Shagufta was let on hire by co-accused Din Muhammad to Munawar Ali petitioner for the purpose of illicit intercourse. The transaction was settled in the presence of Qasid Ali and Muhammad Saleem P . Ws.

3. In the earlier petition it was contended that Qasid Ali complainant has sworn an affidavit to the effect that he became a complainant in this case under the threats of Muhammad Shafiq A.S.I. The petition was, however, dismissed on the ground that if the complainant's version was kept out of consideration even then there remains the evidence of Muhammad Saleem P.W. The learned counsel now submits that both the alleged eye-witnesses namely Qasid Ali and Muhammad Saleem have sworn affidavits that they had not seen any such occurrence and were forced by the police to become eye-witnesses. Their affidavits have been placed on the file. Both of them are present in Court. Muhammad Alam, A.S. I.. has identified them. In the circumstances, tire petitioner is admitted to in the sum of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, Lahore City.

S. G Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Kunri lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.