Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SHAMOON versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 (5) Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 11 and 16 of the Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hoodoo) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 14 According to the Investigation Officer, Regulation (XLV of F860), Sections 468 and 471/109, the marriage of the two accused is not a real woman internationally and upon proving her mate with a co-accused and her In the case of the applicant condemning the marriage. Further investigation, in the circumstances denying the applicant's bail, was denied

1987 P Cr. L J 289(1)

[Lahore]

Before Riaz Ahmad, J

SHAMOON--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE and 6 others--Respondents

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2949-B of 1986, decided on 17th December, 1986.

Criminal Procedure Code (V oaf 1898).--

---S. 497(5)--Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss. 11 & 16--Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S. 14--Penal Code (XLV of f860), Ss.468 & 471/109--Bail, cancellation of--According to Investigating Officer, Nikah of the two accused inter se prima facie not genuine--Lady accused asserting her Nikah with co-accused as genuine and denouncing her Nikah with petitioner--Case being of further inquiry, cancellation of bail of petitioner refused in circumstances.

Pervaiz Mehmood Mian for Petitioner.

Muhammad Ashraf Khan for the State.

Ch. Habibur, Rehman for Respondents Nos. 2 to 7.

ORDER

The parties have appeared today in compliance of the direction of this Court. The respondents have joined the investigation. The Investigating Officer state that prima facie the Nikah of Mst. Sakina with Hayat is not genuine. Mst. Sakina is present in Court, vehemently states that she was married with Hayat and her Nikah with him is genuine. She controverts the validity of her marriage with Shamoon.

In this view of the matter it seems to be a case of further enquiry and thus it is not a fit case for the cancellation of bail as prayed. The Investigating Officer shall submit incomplete challan within one week. The trial Court is directed to conclude the trial within a period of six months.

With these observations this petition is dismissed.

S.A. Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates phone number from Jhatta Bhutta lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.