Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

FATEH MUHAMMAD versus MST. KHUDIJA BIBI


Article 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and Schedule of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The minor guardian of a minor guardian whose mother was not appointed legal guardian in custody of a minor girl, the minor's residence, Was not held, as a condition of the father's obligation to pay restitution

1987 M L D 2624

[Lahore]

Before Afrasiab Khan, J

ZAFAR etc. --Petitioners

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2339-B of 1987, decided on 28th July, 1987

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

--S.497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302/14/149/307--Bail, grant of Accused not doing any overt act in commission of crime and their case one of further inquiry--Bail granted.

Liaqat Ali Sindhu for Petitioners.

Muhammad Rafique Butt for the State.

Date of hearing: 28th July, 1987.

ORDER

The petitioners, Zafar son of Muhammad and Allah Ditta son of Sajawal, have moved this petition under section 497 Cr.P.C. for bail after arrest in a case under sections 302/14/149/307 P.P.C. arising .out of FIR No.63/86 dated 14-4-1986 registered against them at Police Station Pindi Bhattian, District Gujranwala.

2. It is argued that the only allegation against the petitioners that they raised lalkara on the spot and that both were empty handed. It is further -argued that no injury whatsoever is attributed to the petitioners. The learned state counsel submitted that all the accused persons including the two petitioners had the common object to murder Inayat and Mst. Akhtari deceased.

3. The petitioners did not do any overt act in the commission of the crime and, therefore, their case is a case of further enquiry.

4. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case I admit the petitioners to bail in the sum of Rs.30,000 (Rupees thirty B thousand) each with two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the A.C. Gujranwala.

M.Y.H./Z-28/L Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Sahiwal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.