Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

PAKISTAN TOBACCO BOARD versus MUHAMMAD YAR


Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 4 Land Award Market Acquisition Market price The dispute over a compact block and the depth of the same soil and all three castes is through the same soil and irrigation collector, however, its value and its The division of the land into four sections for the determination of the award is not being interpreted as any rational basis on which the cost of each strip was fixed. According to the appellant, several factories and their offices are located near the land in dispute and the population was developing near the disputed land and the property was also commercial due to being on the main road. Upon hearing, the trial court determined the fair value of the land in dispute according to market value, and that the increase in the amount of the order, which was given by the collector, was unimaginable in terms of market value.

1987 M L D 2483(1)

[Lahore]

Before Fazl-i-Mahmood, J

MUHAMMAD AFZAL etc. --Petitioners

versus

Mst.NAZEER KHATOON--Respondent

Civil Revision No.89 of 1984, decided on 30th April, 1984.

Punjab Pre-emption Act (I of 1913)--

--S.4--Pre-emption suit--Claim for improvement in suit land- Compensation--Respondent agreeing and undertaking to pay a certain sum to petitioners for improvement made by latter--Petition not pressed and disposed of accordingly.

Fayyaz Ahmad Shaheen for Petitioners.

A.N. Qaisrani and Islam Ali Qureshi for Respondent.

ORDER

The petitioners feel satisfied if the respondent is ready to pay to them on account of the improvements a sum of Rs.10,000 (rupees ten thousand only). The counsel on behalf of the respondent agree to this proposal and it has been undertaken that the said amount would be paid to the petitioners on account of improvements within two weeks from today.

2. In view of this attitude of the parties and the undertaking given by the respondent, the petitioners would not like to press this petition any further. Disposed of accordingly.

M . Y . H . / M-371 /L Petition disposed of.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
lawer from fb area from Chak Jhumra lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.