Find a Lawyer

IFTIKHAR AHMAD versus STATE

Section 2 (2 (b)) Defining AMD Evidence Taking Advantage of Concerned Situation The benefit of the doubt, the defendant's evidence was brought to trial and the FIR was prosecuted by the trial court for raising the buffalo. There was a dispute over the giving of them. They were related to the deceased by the accused in the cattle compound and quarrel which resulted in the death of the accused by the accused. That the complainant had filed a lawsuit because of this. Este could not be substantiated by any material There were certain circumstances which suggested that this was not a death sentence because the prosecution was specifically charged with motions but by any factor It was not proved. Part of the accused or any plan in his mind, especially in the vicinity, was to commit the murder of his real brother before the matter survived. The result of the incident was between the victim and the accused. There was a sudden outbreak in which the suspects' livestock compound involved small-scale detention of dead buffaloes. The accused had only one injury on the accused person. And the same High Court did not revoke the sentence but changed the death sentence to life imprisonment as per the appeal allowed.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• BAJWA INDUSTRIES (PRIVATE) LIMITED v. MUHAMMAD JEHANGIR 2014 CLC 1151
• MURSALEEN v. State 2014 YLR 1155
• UBL INSURERS LIMITED v. ASHIQ HUSSAIN 2014 CLD 1155
• MUNIR MASIH v. State 2014 YLR 1159
• KHURSHEED alias DARA v. State 2014 YLR 1164
• SHAHBAZ AFTAB KHAN v. JUDGE FAMILY COURT 2014 CLC 1168
• NAZIR AHMAD v. REHMAT ALI through Legal Heirs 2014 MLD 1168
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF CHOUDHRY v. State 2014 YLR 1171

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

list of supreme court advocates from Mangi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes