Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MESSRS HAMDARD DAWAKHANA (WAQF) versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX


In the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, the recovery of tax was challenged in the constitutional petition on the request that the income of the applicant be exempted from tax in view of the decision. Other petitions containing the same points are pending in the High Court, its constitutional jurisdiction precluded the receipt of tax guarantees within one month of the submission of bank guarantees, followed by regular hearing of the constitutional petitions. Ordered to set for.

1987 P T D 586

[Karachi High Court]

Before Ajmal Mian and Muhammad Mazhar Ali, JJ.

Messrs HAMDARD DAWAKHANA (Waqf)

Versus

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and others

Constitutional Petition No.301 of 1987, decided on 13th April, 1987.

Income-tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)--

--S. 93--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199--Recovery of tax- Stay--Levy of income-tax challenged in constitutional petition on the plea that petitioner's income was exempt from tax in view of judgment of Supreme Court reported in P L D 1980 S C 84 and that other petitions involving identical points were pending in the Court--High Court, in its constitutional jurisdiction granted stay of recovery of tax subject to furnishing bank-guarantee of the amounts involved within a month and thereafter constitutional petition ordered to be fixed for regular hearing.

Constitutional Petition No. D-69/85 ref.

A. S. Waswani for Petitioner.

Shaikh Hyder for Respondents.

ORDER

AJMAL MIAN, J

.--In the' above petition and the two other connected petitions the levy of income tax, has been impugned on the ground that the petitioner's income was exempted in view of the judgment of the Supreme-Court in the case of Hamdard Dawakhana reported in P L D 1980 S C 84, whereas the contention of the Income-tax Department is that there is no lack of jurisdiction on the part of the Income Tax Officer but there is only dispute as to the recovery and, therefore, the petitioners are not entitled to any stay. It has been further pointed out that factually the petitioners have filed second appeals before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, which are pending. .

2. Mr. Shaikh Hyder has also submitted that big sums are involved in this petition and the other two connected petitions admitted by this Court and, therefore, the stay should not be grant.

3. Since another Division Bench of this Court by an order dated 5-3-1987 passed in Constitution Petition No. D-69/1985 in an identical writ petition filed by the present petitioner has granted the stay subject to furnishing security in respect of the tax amount, we would grant the stay but subject to furnishing bank guarantee of the amounts involved in three writ petitions (either a joint bank guarantee or three separate bank guarantees) within a month and thereafter the above petition as well as the other connected petitions be fixed' for regular hearing as cases No. 1.

M.B.A./H-43/K Recovery stayed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from Sadiqabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.