Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD INAYAT versus STATE


Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section 498 Guarantee Grant Request for Reduction of Guarantee Amount The FIR shows that the entire quantity of the seized stones was not precious stone but it was also imitation stone. The amount of such stones was not shown separately in the IR as the value of the stones was also shown in the FIR that the amount of guarantees over the money was reduced from Rs. 100,000 to Rs. 30,000. had gone

1987 P Cr. L J 2186

[Karachi]

Before Saeeduzzaman Siddiqui. J

MUHAMMAD INAYAT‑‑Applicant

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Special Criminal Bail No. 28 of 1987, decided on 9th April, 1987.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑S. 498‑‑Grant of bail‑‑Application for reduction of bail amount‑ F.I.R.showing that entire quantity of stones seized was not precious stones but also contained imitation stones and quantity of such stones were not separately shown in F.I.R.‑‑Valuation of stones as shown in the F.I.R. was also arbitrarily high‑‑Amount of bail was reduced to Rs.30,000 from Rs.1,00,000 in the circumstances.

K.M. Nadeem for Applicant.

Abdul Sattar for the State.

ORDER

The applicant has been granted bail by the learned trial Court in the sum of Rs.1,00,000 with P.R. bond in the like amount. The applicant has now applied for reduction of the bail amount. It is contended by the learned counsel that even according to the F.I.R. the entire quantity of stones seized was not precious stones but it also contained imitation stones but the quantity of these stones are not separately shown in the F.I.R. The learned counsel also contend that valuation disclosed in the F.I.R. for these stones is arbitrarily high. Keeping in view of the above circumstances I reduce the amount of bail to Rs.30,000 with one surety and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

M.B.A. /M‑111/K Bail amount reduced.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
lawer from fb area from Battagram lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.