Article 302 (b) / 34 Law of Martyrs (10 of 1984), Article 129 (g) Appreciating the Excellent, Shared Intentions of Murder Most naturalistic witnesses take advantage of suspicion at 12 o'clock (midnight). The incident occurred at odd hours on the side of the road, and the crime report did not provide the proper source of light, at the relevant time, the presence of the complainant and the prosecution witnesses at odd hours of the night, Question, which was seriously needed. Consider, when both were resident 5 km and 1 1/2 km from the scene of the incident, the complainant stated that he had witnessed the incident, with the prosecutor's witness, and that they believed the accused Had escaped, but, complaining, he did not specifically name the accused, not even mentioning the body structure of the accused, as well as the identity of the accused. The prosecution's version in this regard cannot be easily overlooked. The ore was fluctuating, and the prosecution did not believe the identity of the accused, as disclosed in the complainant's statement, has no authenticity, as the bodies were found from scattered locations. In the absence of any solid evidence at this point, in the solitude, the complainant's statement on this score cannot be trusted, especially in this case, which involves the death penalty, conducting a test identification parade. There was, of course, a great deal of significance, but the work was not done without cause. Most natural evidence of independent witnesses who had no relationship with either party, the prosecution prosecution
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
