Settlement of sections 13 and 24 by Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. VII, R 11 and Section 115 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Applicants, by the court, according to the amount stated in the jurisdiction. Defendants' petition to dismiss the revision waiver on the scope of the plaintiffs held that the plaintiff was obliged to submit the agricultural sum according to the amount deposited on Haram Som, to dismiss the plaintiff by trial. The application was dismissed, but the appellate court accepted it, according to the plaintiff, fixing the golden property in dispute, to the court. The plaintiff and the contents of the documents also had to be kept in mind, according to the plaintiff, Rs. 30,000 was sold for consideration and the amount mentioned in the mutation was not audible. There is no other option and no illegal work was done while designating the same order for submission. No objection was raised at the time of submission to his lawyer in connection with the submission of Zarar Saum and a petition was filed to dismiss the plaintiff. Eleven months after the submission of the XI, caution and caution were required by the trial court in fixing Zia Som, but the trial court should not justify much mathematics about the exact amount of consideration. , Only documents are available for fixing before the court. The cave was favored and affiliated with E-Som.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
