Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeals Nos. 280/11, etc. of 1985, decided on 20th October, 1985.
‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Ss. 35 & 38‑A‑‑Leave to appeal granted to consider questions, whether Labour Courts constituted under S.35 of Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 had jurisdiction to entertain, try and adjudicate grievance of workers employed in nationalised Banks and financial institutions arising out of infringement of any term of award of Wage Commission constituted under S.38‑A of Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969.
‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), S. 22‑B (3)(a)‑‑Leave to appeal granted to consider question, whether National Industrial Relations Commission had sole jurisdiction under S.22‑B(3)(a) of Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 to entertain and adjudicate cases of workers employed in nationalised Banks and financial institutions for redress of their individual grievance guaranteed under any law or an award or settlement.
‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968)‑‑Leave to appeal granted to consider question, whether provisions of West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 were applicable to cases of workers employed in nationalized Banks and financial institutions.
‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), S.2 (xxviii)‑‑Leave to appeal granted to consider question, whether dismissed workers employed in nationalized Banks and financial institutions were not covered by definition of 'worker' as embodied in S.2(xxviii) of Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969.
Khan Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondents.
Ch. Sadiq Muhammad Warraich, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
Kh. M. Farooq, Advocate Supreme Court with Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No. 1.
Mirza Anwar Beg, Advocate Supreme Court Instructed by Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑record for Petitioner.
Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No. 1.
Zaki‑ud‑Din Pal, Senior Advocate Supreme Court with Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record-on Petitioner.
Sh. Aftab Ahmed, Advocate Supreme Court with Rashid Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for respondents.
Muhammad Zain‑ul‑Abedin Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Muhammad Aslam Chaudhry Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondents.
Muhammad Asghar Malik, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondents.
Ch. Ghulam Qadir, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate-on‑Record (absent) for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondents.
Zaki‑ud‑Din Pal, Senior Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on-record for Petitioner.
Sh. Aftab Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for respondent No. 1.
Asghar Khadim; Advocate l4pareme Court instructed by Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Recordi4 Petitioner.
Sh. Aftab Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. Masood Akhter, Advocate‑on‑Record for respondents.
Asghar Khadim, Advocate supreme Court instructed by Mahmood A. Qureshi Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Sh. Aftab Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for respondents.
Asghar Khadim, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Sh. Aftab Hussain Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. Masud Akhtar Advocate‑on-Record for Supreme Court with Sh. Masud
Asghar Khadim, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Mahmood A . Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Sh. Aftab Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for respondents.
Asghar Khadim, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Sh. Aftab Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Asghar Khadim, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Sh. Aftab Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Ch. M.A. Khadim, Advocate Supreme Court with Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Sh. Aftab Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Ch. M.A. Khadim, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Sh. Aftab Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Ch. M.A. Khadim, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Sh. Aftab Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Ch. M.A. Khadim, Advocate Supreme Court with Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Sh. Aftab Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Ch. M.A. Khadim, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Sh. Aftab Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Ch. M.A. Khadim, Advocate Supreme Court with Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Sh. Aftab Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Muhammad Zaman Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
Sh. Aftab Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Muhammad Zaman Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
Sh. Aftab Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Sh. Aftab Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents
Muhammad Zaman Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondent.
Muhammad Zaman Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
S.M. Zamir Zaidi, Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent.
Nemo for Petitioner.
Sh. Aftab Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Ch. M.A. Khadim, Advocate Supreme Court with Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
S.M. Zamir Zaidi, Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Ch. M.A. Kahdim Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondents.
Muhammad Asghar Malik, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Muhammad Asghar Malik, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondents.
Muhammad Asghar Malik, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Muhammad Asghar Malik, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Nemo for Petitioner.
Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
]
Muhammad Asghar Malik (absent) for Petitioner.
Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Muhammad Asghar Malik, Advocate Supreme Court (absent) for Petitioner.
Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Muhammad Asghar Malik, Advocate Supreme Court (absent) for Petitioner.
Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Muhammad Asghar Malik, Advocate Supreme Court (absent) for Petitioner.
Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Muhammad Asghar Malik, Advocate Supreme Court (absent) for Petitioner.
Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Ch. M.A. Khadim, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Muhammad Asghar Malik, Advocate Supreme Court (absent) for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondent.
Muhammad Asghar Malik, Advocate Supreme Court (absent) for Petitioner.
Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Nemo for Petitioner.
Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Nemo for Petitioner.
Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Nemo for Petitioner.
Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Nemo for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondents.
Muhammad Asghar Malik, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondents.
Muhammad Asghar Malik, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Muhammad Asghar Malik, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondents.
Muhammad Asghar Malik, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Muhammad Asghar Malik, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for the Respondents
Muhammad Asghar Malik, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondents.
Muhammad Asghar Malik, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondents.
Muhammad Asghar Malik, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondents.
Muhammad Asghar Malik, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Nemo for Petitioner.
Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Muhammad Asghar Malik, Advocate Supreme Court with Muhammad Aslam Choudhry, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondents.
Muhammad Asghar Malik, Advocate Supreme Court with Muhammad Aslam Choudhry, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondents.
Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court/Advocate‑on -Record for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondents.
Ch. Qamar‑ud‑Din Khan Meo, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondents.
Muhammad Asghar Malik, Advocate Supreme Court with Muhammad Aslam Choudhry, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Sh. Masood Akhter, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
S. Manzoor Hussain Bokhari, Advocate Supreme Court with Rana Maqbool Ahmed Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Sh. Masood Akhter, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑‑Record for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondents.
Bashir Ahmed, Advocate Supreme Court (absent) with Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Sh. Masood Akhter, Advocate‑on‑Record for the Respondents.
Bashir Ahmed, Advocate Supreme Court (absent) with Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for the Petitioner.
Sheikh Masood Ahmed, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Ch. Ghulam Qadir Cheema, Advocate Supreme Court with Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Sh. Masood Ahmed, Advocate‑on‑Record for the Respondents
Ch. Ghulam Qadir Cheema for Petitioner. Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Nemo for Petitioner.
Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for the Respondents.
Muhammad Zeman Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondent.
Nemo for Petitioner.
Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Muhammad Asghar Malik, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
Sh. Masood Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
M.A. Zafar, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondents.
Date of hearing: 20th October, 1985.
‑All these petitions involve certain common facts and questions of law and these were, therefore, heard together. Petitioners are employees of respondent‑Banks and their services were terminated or they were dismissed from service. They challenged the validity of these orders before the Labour Courts through petitions under section 25‑A of Industrial Relations Ordinance. Most of these petitions succeeded, some were however, dismissed.
The parties aggrieved by the orders passed in these petitions filed appeals before the Punjab Labour Appellate Tribunal, but all these were dismissed. Against the orders passed by the Labour Appellate Tribunal several writ petitions were filed in Lahore High Court which have been decided by the common judgment, dated 10‑4‑1985. The High Court held that the Labour Appellant Tribunal had no jurisdiction to decide the cases brought by the petitioners.
It is in these circumstances that petitioners have filed these petitions before us for leave to appeal from the judgment of the High Court.
All the learned counsel appearing before us state that the petitions involve the following important questions of law which deserve authoritative decision of this Court.
(a) Whether the Labour Courts constituted under section 35 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 have jurisdiction to entertain, try and adjudicate the grievances of workers employed in the Nationalized Banks and Financial Institutions arising out of the infringement of any term of the award of Wage Commission constituted under section 38‑A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969
(b) Whether the National Industrial Relations Commission has sole jurisdiction under section 22‑B(3)(a) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 to entertain and adjudicate cases of workers employed in the Nationalized Banks and Financial Institutions for redress of their individual grievance guaranteed under any law or an award or settlement
(c) Whether the provisions of West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 are applicable to the cases of workers employed in the Nationalized Banks and Financial Institutions
(d) Whether dismissed workers employed in the Nationalized Banks and Financial Institutions are not covered by the definition of 'worker' as embodied in section 2(xxviii) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969
Since the aforesaid questions of law, amongst ethers, are likely to govern large number of cases, it is necessary that an authoritative decision of this Court be rendered. Leave to appeal is granted in all the petitions, subject however, that in five petitions, namely C.P.S.L.A. No. 689 of 1985; C.P.S.L.A. No. 713 of 1985; C.P.S.L.A. No. 747 of 1985; C.P.S.L.A. No. 818 of 1985 and C.P.S.L.A. No. 957 of 1985,1 the question of bar of limitation will be considered at the regular hearing.
Security Rs. 500 in each case.
The appeals arising out of these petitions will be heard together on the present record. The parties are however, at liberty to file additional documents, if any.
The interim order of this Court, dated 29th May, 1985 in C.P.S.L.A. 481 of 1985 is confirmed in terms it is clarified by the subsequent order of this Court dated 16‑9‑1985 passed in C.P.S.L.A. No. 502 of 1985.
M.Y.H. Leave granted.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer