ADIL SHER versus STATE

Article 7 (185) appeal for a leave to appeal

1986 S C M R 136(1)

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Actg. C. J., Nasim Hasan Shah and S.A. Nusrat, JJ

ADIL SHER‑‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE Respondent

Criminal Petition No. 10‑P of 1985, decided on 8th October, 1985.

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ ‑

--‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Petition for leave to appeal‑‑Limitation‑‑No plausible explanation given for condoning delay in filing petition‑‑Petition dismissed as barred by time.

Muhammad Shafiq, Advocate Supreme Court and M. Qasim Imam, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioner.

Nemo for the State.

ORDER

ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, ACTG. C.J.‑

‑This petition is barred b 34 days. No plausible explanation has been given for condoning the delay in filing the petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as barred by time.

M . Y . H . Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer

Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad

ask a advocate free from Kohistan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes

👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.

Lawyers Directory Listing

Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

ADIL SHER versus STATE

Find a Lawyer Near You