Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

KHAN ASHFAQUE-UR-REHMAN KHAN versus MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE


Article 185 (3) Public land auction confirmation Auction confirmation, after approval by the Deputy Commissioner's discretionary board, refuses to confirm auction without hearing the board of revenue whose name the auction approved Was, no natural justice code, violated by the Member Board of Revenue

1986 S C M R 129

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain and M.S.H. Quraishi, JJ

KHAN ASHFAQUE‑UR‑REHMAN KHAN‑‑Petitioner

versus

MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE and another‑‑Respondent

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 577 of 1980, decided on 8th June, 1985.

(Against order/judgment of Lahore High Court, dated 13‑2‑1980 passed in W.P. No. 4404 of 1978).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑State land‑‑Auction of Government land‑‑Confirmation of auction, after approval by Deputy Commissioner discretionary with Board of Revenue‑‑Member Board of Revenue refusing to confirm auction without hearing petitioner in whose name auction was approved‑‑No rule of natural justice, held, violated by Member Board of Revenue in circumstances.

Haji Muhammad Anwar Buttar, Advocate Supreme Court and Muhammad Aslam Chaudhry, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondent.

Date of hearing: 8th June, 1985.

ORDER

ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑

‑Petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the judgment of the High Court, dated 13‑2‑1980, dismissing his writ petition relating to the auction of certain Government land in petitioner's favour.

2. The auction took place on 5‑9‑1977 which was approved by the Deputy Commissioner. But subsequently, however, the Board of Revenue refused to confirm it. The petitioner challenged the order of the Board of Revenue through a review application against the same but it was dismissed by the Board of Revenue. The petitioner then challenged the said orders through a Constitution petition which was rejected by the impugned judgment.

3. The only contention raised by the petitioner's counsel before us is that before refusing to confirm the auction in petitioner's favour he had not been heard by the Member Board of Revenue, which according to him violates the rule of natural justice.

4. We are not inclined to agree with this contention as it was the discretion of the Board of Revenue to confirm or refuse to confirm the auction, without hearing him. In this view of the matter the petition is dismissed.

M. Y. H. Leave refused

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates email from Khewra lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.