Lawyers Directory Listing
Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.
Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 356‑R of 1985, decided on 15th October, 1985.
‑‑‑Art. 186‑A‑‑Supreme Court Rules, 1980, 0. V, r. 3‑‑Refusal to entertain petition under Art. 186‑A by Registrar of Supreme Court‑‑No exception, held, could be taken to same‑‑No ground made out for interference‑‑Petition dismissed.
Raja Muhammad Anwar, Senior Advocate Supreme Court with Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for the Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondent.
The Registrar has rightly refused to entertain the petition under Article 186‑A of the Constitution. No ground is made out for interference in the order. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Petition which is an appeal under Order V, rule 3 of this Court's rules is dismissed.
M. Y. H. Petition dismissed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer