Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

QUTABUDDIN versus SANAULLAH


Article 4 (185 ()) is a suggestion for the appellant that because the appellant has occupied the disputed premises, his appeal has been invalidated.

1986 S C M R 43

Present: Shafiur Rahman, Zaffar Hussain Mirza and Mian Burhanuddin Khan, JJ

QUTABUDDIN‑‑Petitioner

versus

SANAULLAH and others‑‑Respondents

Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 345‑R of 1985 in Civil Appeal No. 199 of 1983, decided on 13th October, 1985.

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Counsel for appellant stating that since appellant has obtained possession of disputed premises his appeal has become infructuous‑‑Appeal dismissed as infructuous.

Ch. Muhammad Aslam, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No.l.

ORDER

SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.‑

‑Learned counsel for the appellant has filed an application stating therein that this appeal has become infructuous as he has obtained the possession of disputed premises. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.

M. Y. H. Appeal dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Ubaro lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.