Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ALLAH YAR ALIAS YARA versus STATE


Article 185 (3) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Appeals for appeal by the accused to the court for re-evaluation of the evidence and the discovery of facts on record by the accused. Supreme Court dismisses plea for non-entry into such practice

1986 S C M R 1110 (2)

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Muhammad Afzal Zullah, JJ

ALLAH YAR alias YARA and others‑‑Petitioners

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Petition No. 78‑R of 1985, decided on 7th April, 1986.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 28‑5‑1985 passed in Murder Reference No. 88 of 1982, and Criminal Revision No. 581 of 1982) .

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302/34‑‑Petition for leave to appeal‑‑Contentions raised by counsel for accused amounting only to a prayer for reappraisal of evidence on record and to reverse findings of facts arrived at by Courts below‑‑Supreme Court not to enter into such exercise‑‑Petition dismissed.

Aftab Farrukh, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Akhter Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.

Nemo for the State.

Date of hearing: 7th April, 1986.

ORDER

ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.

‑‑Allah Yar alias Yara and others petitioners (herein) seeks leave to appeal against the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Lahore convicting them under section 302/34, P.P.C.

2. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners at a considerable length. The contention raised by him amount only to a prayer for reappraisal of evidence on the record and to reverse findings of facts arrived at by the Court its below. We 'are afraid in the circumstances of this case we cannot consider it proper to enter into this exercise. This petition, is, therefore, dismissed as having no force.

M. Y. H. Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Gharo lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.