Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.
Civil Petition No. 935 of 1985, decided on 13th November, 1985
(On appeal the judgment, dated 1‑8‑1985 of the Punjab Service Tribunal Lahore in Case No. 115/199 of 1985).
‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Leave to appeal, grant of‑‑No substantial question of law of public importance being involved, leave to appeal refused
Sh. Munir Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondents.
Date of hearing: 13th November, 1985.
‑The petitioner an ex‑Kanoongo, was removed from service by the District Collector vide order, dated 22‑7‑1985. His appeal to the Commissioner, Multan Division, Multan, was rejected on 7‑1‑1985. He then filed an appeal before the Punjab Service Tribunal, which too was dismissed vide order, dated 1‑8‑1985. Hence this petition for leave to appeal.
2. We have heard Sh. Munir Ahmad, learned Advocate‑on‑Record for the petitioner in support of this petition. He has not been able to establish that any substantial question of law of public importance is involved in this case. Hence no ground for grant of leave to appeal under Article 212 of the Constitution exists. The petition is dismissed.
M.I. Petition dismissed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer